Skip to main content
This page is for the cautious teacher and the administrator. It says what happens to a piece of student work between upload and your review.

What it reads

Three things: the student’s work, your instructions, and either your rubric or your answer key. If you added handout materials, it reads those for context. It does not read other students’ work while grading one student, and it never sees the rest of the class.

The two paths

When it declines to score

If a criterion needs evidence the AI can’t see, it doesn’t guess. The card reads Needs your review with the reason, and offers Grade it myself or Add context & regrade. A note marked For your attention means it graded but wants you to check something. Both are visible only to you.

Where you stay in the loop

Every submission lands in Needs review. You can change any level or points, with a reason; rewrite any feedback; and ask the assistant for changes it proposes and you approve. Nothing reaches a student until you share.

What it never does

  • It does not decide when students see anything. You do, by sharing.
  • It does not show students its analysis. The reasoning, the evidence quotes and your override reasons are stripped before a page is sent to a student. Who can see what
  • It does not detect plagiarism or AI-written work, and GradingPal declines instructions that ask it to. Those checks are unreliable and misfire on students writing in a second language.
  • It does not curve, rank, or hold a floor across the class. Each student is graded alone.
  • Grammar findings never change a score.

Who can see what

Teacher, co-teacher, student, school.

Ask GradingPal to make changes

Propose, review, apply.

Last updated 19 September 2026

Yes, this helpedNo, something’s wrong

Report a problem with this page